|
What's
new
1/24/12
New
Blog Entry
One
of Those Oscar Years
1/15/12
New
Review of
The
Iron Lady **
1/14/12
New
Review of
Contraband
***1/2
1/9/12
New
Review of
Tinker
Tailor Soldier Spy ***
1/7/12
New
Blog Entry
The
Mission: Impossible Rises Show-in IMAX!
1/2/12
New
Blog Entry
Why
The
Help is the Inevitable Best Picture
12/31/11
New
Feature Article:
The
Best Movies of 2011
New
Reviews of
The
Darkest Hour ***
The
Descendants ****
12/30/11
New
Review of
Horrible
Bosses ***1/2
12/29/11
New
Reviews of
Killer
Elite ***
Straw
Dogs **1/2
Young
Adult ****
12/28/11
New
Review of
Warrior
****
12/27/11
New
Reviews of
Mission:
Impossible-Ghost Protocol ****
Take
Shelter ****
12/26/11
New
Reviews of
My
Week with Marilyn ***
Shark
Night 3D ***
12/25/11
New
Review of
Sherlock
Holmes: A Game of Shadows ****
|
Cream
of the Crop
The Best
Movie Currently in Wide Release

|
Mission:
Impossible-Ghost Protocol
"The
Mission:
Impossible movie franchise was born at a uniquely strange time in the
evolution of the modern blockbuster, when studios had begun to fully commit
to raiding their vaults for remakes and adaptations of TV series but had
not yet gotten a clue that it was the fans of those pre-existing properties
that were their target audience. As such,
M:I, the popular
late-60’s espionage series about a team of agents became a star vehicle
for Tom Cruise who played a team of one in Brian DePalma’s diverting but
forgettable flick that made sure no one confused the filmmakers with fans
of the series by allowing original IMF leader Jim Phelps (then played by
Jon Voigt) to die only after revealing he was a traitor. But either
way, money rolled in and a franchise without a direction or purpose was
born. Latching on to Hong Kong director John Woo’s success with Face/Off,
he was hired to helm Mission: Impossible 2, a laughable unintentional
parody of his best work that again grossed money hand over fist but left
Cruise and the Paramount suits knowing they still needed to find some kind
of point and direction for his cypherous IMF hero Ethan Hunt. Enter
JJ Abrams, the TV mogul looking to make his feature directorial debut.
He and the team responsible for the cult TV series Alias finally
licked the whole Mission: Impossible thing with M:I3,
which gave Hunt a wife, a life, friends, a workplace and, dare I say it,
stakes. Then something really nasty happened: a series of PR
missteps caused Cruise to fall out of favor with the public and it seemed
that the underperforming sequel would be Hunt’s swan song. But that’s
the thing about franchises, they provide actors with a safe harbor during
the valleys of their careers and under the producorial eye of Abrams, with
many of the Alias team intact and Incredibles animation wiz
Brad Bird making his live action directorial debut, the series finally
hits a new high note five and a half years later with Mission:
Impossible-Ghost Protocol, which does everything the original M:I
got
wrong right, building a solid team in a slam-bang espionage thriller packed
with amazing stunts. Most of all, it really understands the human
dynamic necessary to make an action blockbuster run. Who cares if
Ethan Hunt prevails if he’s an indestructible superman? But if it
takes everything he’s got to turn his amp to 11… well, THAT’S a movie hero,
and Mission: Impossible-Ghost Protocol is a globetrotting
spy action flick of the highest order... Cruise dramatically upgraded his
performance the last time out, but in Ghost Protocol, he’s really
got Hunt licked: in the grand tradition of Harrison Ford’s Indiana
Jones, he’s got a bug-eyed “You’ve GOT to be kidding me!” reaction shot
for each time he’s got to push it that much harder to get the job done.
And this mission pushed him about as far as any person could possibly go,
trying to outrun exploding Kremlins and dust storms, dodging flying vehicles
and enduring an absolutely insane climax at an Indian automotive dealership
where all the cars are on hydraulic platforms that require him to leap
impossible distances and seemingly get whacked in the jaw 35 times… and
that’s before he comes up with a really novel way to jump 50 feet and survive.
The best stunt-based action movies know how to put their heroes through
the wringer, but M:I4 may very well set a new standard." |
|
The
View From the Balcony:
Lamar's
Blog
1/24/12
One
of Those Oscar Years
Yes,
last year's Academy Awards broadcast was a debacle, as no one would dare
question even if they were that lonely soul who found James Franco's Cigar
Store Indian act to be the height of comic inspiration. But the show
is always secondary to me to the history it's writing, and the 2011 Oscars
delivered the most on-the-money set of nominees and winners since that
golden 1998 when the fearsome foursome of Titanic, As Good as
it Gets, Good Will Hunting and LA Confidential dominated
the proceedings. As such, I was due for a down decade or so, and
the 2012 nominations announced today certainly get that process rolling.
As
I've mentioned before, it's hard for me to get that interested in the proceedings
pro or con because there's just so little here I've seen. The
Help, Moneyball, War Horse, The Tree of Life,
The Artist... lots of stuff on my "Um, I guess if I have the time..."
list. I have to say I kinda object to the love showered on Moneyball,
though. I'm not unbiased, as the Oakland A's of that era routinely
beat up on my beloved Texas Rangers and I've never been a fan of the real-life
Billy Beane's self-promoting tendencies (I honestly think he's not only
not a genius, but kinda an idiot, believing his own hype to the point where
he trades the entire team almost every year because of that silly "You're
either contending or rebuilding" mantra: but I digress, this isn't
a baseball blog). But more to the point, everything I've read about
the movie suggests it's a total fantasy, denying the fact that the A's
of the time not only enjoyed the services of some of the league's most
talented players, but also a great many All-Stars who would later be revealed
to be among the leading offenders in the game's scanalous Steroid Era.
Instead, writers Steven Zaillian, Aaron Sorkin and Stan Chevin would have
us believe those teams were akin to the one in Major League, comprised
of journeymen Jonah Hill's mathmatical formulas figured out how to use.
Which also brings us to the notion that I'm to believe that not only has
Hill given a Best Supporting Actor-worthy performance in a year when so
many top talents were excluded from the category, but that he's done it
as a geek with a mathmatical formula to win baseball games.
Read
more
Recent
Blogs
1/7/12:
The Mission: Impossible Rises Show-in
IMAX!
1/2/12:
Why
The
Help is the Inevitable Best Picture
Blog
Archive
|