|
What's
new
2/1/12
New
Review of
Man
on a Ledge ****
1/28/12
New
Review of
Extremely
Loud & Incredibly Close ***1/2
1/24/12
New
Blog Entry
One
of Those Oscar Years
1/15/12
New
Review of
The
Iron Lady **
1/14/12
New
Review of
Contraband
***1/2
1/9/12
New
Review of
Tinker
Tailor Soldier Spy ***
1/7/12
New
Blog Entry
The
Mission: Impossible Rises Show-in IMAX!
1/2/12
New
Blog Entry
Why
The
Help is the Inevitable Best Picture
12/31/11
New
Feature Article:
The
Best Movies of 2011
New
Reviews of
The
Darkest Hour ***
The
Descendants ****
12/30/11
New
Review of
Horrible
Bosses ***1/2
12/29/11
New
Reviews of
Killer
Elite ***
Straw
Dogs **1/2
Young
Adult ****
12/28/11
New
Review of
Warrior
****
12/27/11
New
Reviews of
Mission:
Impossible-Ghost Protocol ****
Take
Shelter ****
|
Cream
of the Crop
The Best
Movie Currently in Wide Release

|
Man
on a Ledge
"I try not to read
any full-length reviews of movies I’m going to write about before I’ve
done my own review. But it’s impossible for my curious brain not
to peek at Rotten Tomatoes.com and its gradually building critical consensus
on the week’s new movies. Obviously, RT has a bias clearly revealed
in its’ name (a movie receiving 59% positive reviews is still stamped “Rotten”),
but I’m still always hoping to see that little fresh tomato hover over
the films I plan to see. Not that a splat means I’m not going to
have a good time: even a casual perusal of this site will tell you
that I can be a contrarian, and I’m notoriously easy to please within my
favorite genres. But one has to be concerned when critical condemnation
is as universal as for the new Summit release Man on a Ledge, and
the mostly scathing reviews sent me in with tempered expectations despite
a strong trailer and a great cast. Funny thing is, the Man on
a Ledge I saw isn’t just better than advertised: it’s a near-perfect
popcorn creation filled with skillfully- sketched, wonderfully-played characters
going through the paces of the first feature screenplay by veteran TV movie
writer Pablo F. Fenjves (who had a previous, far less desirable brush with
fame as a witness in the O.J. Simpson trial). Man on a Ledge
is filled with lucky breaks, split-second escapes and astonishing feats
of courage, but to those who dismiss it as “preposterous”, I’d ask who
makes a movie about the guys who just barely get HIT by a train?
I loved Man on a Ledge to pieces, and I strongly suggest you shrug
off the naysayers and give it a try... Man on a Ledge’s stew is
filled with reliable ingredients: an innocent man wrongfully
imprisoned, a good cop who needs to redeem herself for a past mistake,
a diabolical billionaire, backstabbing traitors hidden in plain sight and
a loyal family who’ll risk anything to help each other out. And the
great cast director Asger Leth has assembled makes these archetypes sing.
Worthington, who’s taken it hard in those inexplicable reviews I referenced
earlier, is effectively desperate and holds the screen nicely in a lead
role that mostly demands he stay in one place. Banks’ Everywoman
appeal is perfect for the cop who’s gone twelve rounds with life but still
has the guts to make a judgment call and stick with it. I don’t know
that Bell’s frumpy Little Brother casualness has ever been put to better
use. Burns does a great job playing Dougherty as a professional who
cares about getting the guy off the ledge more than Departmental politics.
And Anthony Mackie and Titus Welliver do a solid job of pitching their
suspicious officers such that we can’t be sure whether they’re on Englander’s
payroll or not... Leth knows how to stage an action sequence, and Nick’s
spectacularly close call of an escape from the funeral is a real nail-biter,
as are a couple of Joey and Angie’s misadventures at jewel thievery.
But the movie’s most exciting moment, likely to stand up as one of the
most exciting of the year, comes near the end when one of our heroes is
forced to go far, far above and beyond the call to try and stop Englander
and I noted with admiration how Fenjves had planted not one but TWO setups
in the dialog that made it equally possible that the movie was laying the
groundwork for total success or heroic sacrifice. So even those skilled
at decoding a script as it unfolds can’t really know which of two glaring
possibilities will play out until the scene finishes its business."
|
|
The
View From the Balcony:
Lamar's
Blog
1/24/12
One
of Those Oscar Years
Yes,
last year's Academy Awards broadcast was a debacle, as no one would dare
question even if they were that lonely soul who found James Franco's Cigar
Store Indian act to be the height of comic inspiration. But the show
is always secondary to me to the history it's writing, and the 2011 Oscars
delivered the most on-the-money set of nominees and winners since that
golden 1998 when the fearsome foursome of Titanic, As Good as
it Gets, Good Will Hunting and LA Confidential dominated
the proceedings. As such, I was due for a down decade or so, and
the 2012 nominations announced today certainly get that process rolling.
As
I've mentioned before, it's hard for me to get that interested in the proceedings
pro or con because there's just so little here I've seen. The
Help, Moneyball, War Horse, The Tree of Life,
The
Artist... lots of stuff on my "Um, I guess if I have the time..." list.
I have to say I kinda object to the love showered on Moneyball,
though. I'm not unbiased, as the Oakland A's of that era routinely
beat up on my beloved Texas Rangers and I've never been a fan of the real-life
Billy Beane's self-promoting tendencies (I honestly think he's not only
not a genius, but kinda an idiot, believing his own hype to the point where
he trades the entire team almost every year because of that silly "You're
either contending or rebuilding" mantra: but I digress, this isn't
a baseball blog). But more to the point, everything I've read about
the movie suggests it's a total fantasy, denying the fact that the A's
of the time not only enjoyed the services of some of the league's most
talented players, but also a great many All-Stars who would later be revealed
to be among the leading offenders in the game's scanalous Steroid Era.
Instead, writers Steven Zaillian, Aaron Sorkin and Stan Chevin would have
us believe those teams were akin to the one in Major League, comprised
of journeymen Jonah Hill's mathmatical formulas figured out how to use.
Which also brings us to the notion that I'm to believe that not only has
Hill given a Best Supporting Actor-worthy performance in a year when so
many top talents were excluded from the category, but that he's done it
as a geek with a mathmatical formula to win baseball games.
Read
more
Recent
Blogs
1/7/12:
The Mission: Impossible Rises Show-in
IMAX!
1/2/12:
Why
The
Help is the Inevitable Best Picture
Blog
Archive
|